|
ALL 7 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
LOCAL UNIONS RECOMMEND REJECTION
·
NO WAGE INCREASE UNTIL OCTOBER 3, 2005
·
PERMANENT TWO TIER WAGES AND BENEFITS
·
NO MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS
·
DRASTIC CUTS IN BENEFITS
·
NEW 7,800 HOUR PROGRESSION FOR EMPLOYEES HIRED AFTER OCT. 5, 2003
·
NEW HIRE TOP PAY RATE $2.80 BELOW CURRENT TOP RATES
·
DRASTICALLY REDUCED PENSION ACCRUALS
|
Employer Proposal |
Effect
of proposal |
|
Article
1 – Agreement does not apply to new stores in areas where
unionized market share is less than 25%. |
Employers will open non-union stores, destroying our
future bargaining strength. |
|
Article
1(B)(13) – Unlimited use of vendors, brokers, salesmen etc. |
Further
elimination of stocking work, TOTAL EROSION OF CLERK’S WORK. |
|
Article
1(B)(14) – Add additional management exclusion in all stores |
Elimination of some bargaining unit work. |
|
Article
1(F)(1) – Allow incidental purchases of 5 items or less at cash
registers outside of primary checkstand area. (Pharmacy, service
deli, Starbucks etc.) |
Loss of
Food Clerks work and hours. The GM Departments will not be paid
food rate. |
|
Article
1(F)(3) – Clerk’s Helpers can perform periodic overall mopping
and cleaning the shelves. (Clerk’s Helpers can only remove and
replace merchandise necessary to clean shelf – no stocking) |
Minor
expansion of Clerk Helper duties. |
|
Article
5(A)(1) – With the exception of Meatcutters – 16 weeks to obtain
full-time status must be worked in single store each week or
with knowledge of manager or District Manager |
Clarification of requirement to obtain full-time status. |
|
Article
5(J) – Allow eight hour shifts within ten hour period for
part-time employees on a voluntary basis. |
Beginning of split-shifts. Least senior employee could get more
hours.
|
|
Article
5 (U) Work in Higher Class – Remove restrictions on General
Merchandise Clerks working in higher classification and allow
unlimited, unrestricted use of General Merchandise Clerks
working in higher classification.
|
Will
result in the reduction of Food Clerk positions. Current Food
Clerks’ hours will be given to GM Clerks. |
|
Article
6(B) Night Premiums – shorten hours of night premium to 10:00
p.m. through 6:00 a.m. |
Reduction of pay for work performed between 6:00 p.m. and 10:00
p.m. |
|
Article
6(B) Sunday Premiums – Freeze Sunday premium for current
employees based upon wage rates in effect as of 10/5/03.
|
Elimination of time and one half on Sunday. |
|
Article
6(J) Clerks Helper Working as Apprentice – Double the number of
Clerks Helper hours that can be scheduled to perform Clerk’s
work. Permit Clerk’s Helpers to work as Clerks on Sundays and
holidays. Drastically reduce penalty for violation of this
provision.
|
Will
result in the reduction of the Food Clerk position. Current
Food Clerks hours will be given to Clerk’s Helpers. |
|
Article
9 – Funeral Leave – add grandchildren to definition of immediate
family.
|
Employer agreed to union proposal. |
|
Article
14(X) – Stewards – Eliminate annual paid day of training for
stewards. |
Employer attempt to destroy our stewards’ program. |
|
Appendix D – Meat Department Employees – Allow for unlimited
case ready meat. |
Phasing
out of Meatcutters. No promotional opportunities into
Meatcutter classification. |
|
Bonuses |
30¢
bonus for Food Clerks and Meat Cutters in 2003 and 2004 based on
hours worked in previous year. 30¢ bonus for General
Merchandise Clerks, Meat Clerks and Pharmacy Technicians in 2003
and 25¢ in 2004 based on hours worked in previous year. 15¢
bonus for Clerks Helpers in 2003 and 2004 based on hours worked
in previous year. |
|
Wages |
October
2005 – Food Clerks and Meat Cutters – 30¢ per hour.
General
Merchandise Clerks, Meat Clerks Pharmacy Technicians – 25¢ cent
per hour.
Clerks
Helpers – 15¢ per hour. |
|
New
Hires |
|
-
SUNDAY PREMIUM OF $1.00 PER HOUR
-
A
FRACTION OF THE HOLIDAYS
-
SIGNIFICANTLY LESS VACATION
-
7800
HOUR PROGRESSION
-
TOP
RATES $2.80 LESS PER HOUR THAN CURRENT RATES
|
Major
incentive to get rid of current employees.
Major
incentive not to promote current employees. |
ALL 7 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOCAL UNIONS RECOMMEND REJECTION
Analysis of Employer Proposals
HEALTH CARE
Over the term
of the agreement, the employers propose to shift close to ONE
BILLION DOLLARS of Health Care expenses to YOU.
The
employers’ proposal requires you to pay the following weekly premiums
for your Health Care:
Ø
$5 per
week for employee coverage ($260 per year)
Ø
$15
per week for family coverage ($780 per year)
These weekly
premiums would result in a pay reduction for current employees.
The
employers’ proposed contributions are not sufficient to maintain the
current benefits. This contribution rate could result in a 50%
reduction from your current benefit levels. This means your
benefits could be modified as follows:
Ø The
elimination of key ancillary benefits such as Dental, Vision, Well
Baby Care and Preventative Office visits.
Ø Elimination
of Prescription Drug Benefit. At a minimum, the member could be
responsible for up to $75 of a $150 prescription.
Ø
On a
$20,000 hospital bill, instead of 100% reimbursement you could be
responsible for $10,000 or 50% of the entire bill.
Ø
Chemotherapy Treatments could be capped, leaving you with thousands of
dollars in unpaid treatments.
Ø
Significant increases in office visit co-payments. For example on a
$100 office visit, you could be responsible for up to $50 per visit. A
cap on total office visits may also need to be imposed. This means
you could be responsible 100% for some office visits.
Ø
Possible elimination of Kaiser and PacifiCare.
In addition
to a significant reduction in the level of benefits provided to
both existing and all future retirees, retirees would be required
to pay hundreds of dollars a month in premium payments.
The new hire
health care contribution rate proposed by the employers is $3 to $4
per hour less than the rate proposed for your plan of benefits. This
new hire rate would result in approximately a 75% benefit reduction.
Not only is this a totally inadequate level of benefits, but it also
creates an incentive for your employer to get rid of or under-schedule
current employees in favor of lower-cost new hires.
RETIREMENT
The
employers’ proposed contributions are not sufficient to maintain the
current benefits.
Ø At the
proposed contribution rate, there would be no future benefits
earned – whatever you have earned today is all you would get. Thirty
years of full time service would no longer guarantee a $1,900 monthly
benefit.
Ø
Although your benefits already earned are protected by law, the
employer proposal may not even provide enough money to pay these
benefits.
Ø No
Rule of 85 on future accruals.
Ø No
subsidized Joint & Survivor benefit on future accruals. Married
participants benefits would be cut 12%.
Ø No
pensions for future courtesy clerks
The new hire
retirement contribution rate proposed by the employers is 50¢ to $1
per hour less than the rate proposed for your retirement benefits.
Again, another reason for your employer to get rid of or
under-schedule current employees.
Finally,
under the employer proposal, all local union benefit offices would be
closed. This means you would no longer be allowed to get help from
the local union offices with your health care or retirement benefits
|